Found in Liverpool, England, UK, together with other re-situated "sacred" stones which have
all been disturbed to line a walkway at a central "tourist converted" Catholic church namely St.James
Click here to see why there are demons in abundance in the UK
Worshipping and sacrificing was the name of the game in Masonism.
Unfortunately the false Gods ( or demon Gods) of Baal were the focal point.
Now we have a fully run system or business maskerading as part of the City of Culture of Liverpool instead.Click here for pictures of all the buildings that Masons claim to have involvement in.
This is why the Catholic Churches are business run and usually have money boxes and tourist attractions held in them .Because they are steeped in the NWO that jointly these cults will govern.
THE SANDON GROUP IN LIVERPOOL ARE PRETENDING TO BE DO GOODERS, RUNNING THE CITY BUT MOST OF ITS MASON MEMBERS DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE MEN AT THE TOP OF THIS ORGANISATION AND THEIR EVIL GOALS CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION
Believe it or not the Rotary club, the Lions Club and the Diners Club are ALL involved in this cult as mentioned in this page click here
SENT TO MENTAL HOSPITAL THEN DISAPEARED OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH JOHN TODD 1970 ALL BECAUSE HE EXPOSED THE TRUTH
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Watch out for Royalty and the Blair Government in this movie...........
TRUTH ABOUT THE LADY DIANA MURDER
THE ULTIMATE PROOF THAT CHARLES WAS EMBEZZELLED IN A MURDER PLOT TO KILL DIANA
EMBEDDED IN EVERY FACET OF BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND ALL OTHER MAJOR AUTHORITIES IN ENGLAND, WALES AND SCOTLAND.
ALL POLICE FORCES HAVE A LARGE PROPORTION OF MEMBERS NOW IN 2011,
CONTROLLING THE MASSES
CREATING FALSE FLAG SITUATIONS OF CHAOS
Freemasonry in England.....
EVIL
SINCE 1710
GET OUT OR SUFFER
NATO boss and Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened
to sue Scotland’s leading independent newspaper over internet
allegations that he not only used his influence as a Freemason to
procure a gun licence for child killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a
member of a clandestine paedophile ring reportedly set up by Hamilton
for the British elite.
On 13 March 1996, Hamilton, armed with four hand-guns, opened fire on
a junior school class, killing 16 children and one teacher before
turning the gun on himself, shattering forever the idyllic 13th century
Scottish town of Dunblane.
The controversy is certain to topple the Blair government, which has
already issued a D-Notice to gag the press from revealing the names of
known paedophiles within the British executive, including at least two
senior ministers; and the case highlights the government’s antipathy
toward the Sunday Herald and its brand of independent journalism that
has, among other things, exposed the role played by the domestic
security agency, MI5, in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist
atrocities.
As reported by this journalist last month at Propaganda Matrix and
Counter Punch, and by the Sunday Herald’s Home Affairs Editor, Neil
Mackay, the British intelligence services are actively engaged in
preventing any further child sex revelations that could incite further
hostility to an already unpopular Prime Minister and destroy the morale
of troops set to invade Iraq. An intelligence officer told Mackay that
“a ‘rolling’ Cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal
with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the
government if arrests occur.”
Some commentators, mindful that one of Tony Blair’s closest
confidante’s is a practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this
particular scandal, and not Blair’s repeated lies and fabricated reports
in regard to Iraq, may well prove the downfall of a government mired in
sleaze and corruption. The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an
FBI list of Labour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet
child pornography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news
blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most
important aides, Phillip Lyon.
The latest allegations came to light following a campaign to lift the
secrecy on the Dunblane massacre. Large sections of the police report
were banned from the public domain under a 100-year secrecy order. Lord
Cullen, an establishment insider, also omitted and censored references
to the documents in his final report. Parents and teachers were advised
to concentrate their efforts on a campaign to outlaw handguns instead of
focusing on how the mentally unstable Freemason, already known by the
police to be a paedophile, had obtained a firearms licence for six
handguns. Hamilton allegedly enjoyed good relations with both local
Labour luminary George Robertson and Michael Forsyth, the then Scottish
Secretary of State and MP for Stirling. Forsyth congratulated and
encouraged Hamilton for running a boy’s club. Hamilton was also found to
have exchanged letters with the British monarch, Queen Elizabeth.
The rumours and allegations concerning Lord Robertson’s ties to
Hamilton, and the possibility that the American intelligence services
may be blackmailing Tony Blair into continued support for a U.S.
invasion of Iraq, have been given fire by internet investigator and
intelligence expert Michael Keaney:
“An additional, and potentially explosive, aspect of US leverage
over Blair is the FBI’s investigation of users of child porn websites
which has already claimed a number of high profile scalps. [....] The
biggest two fish that come to mind are indeed high profile: firstly
there is George Robertson, who today has announced that he will step
down as NATO Secretary General after four years and two months in the
job. Were he to be fingered the fall out would be spectacular but
short-lived — he’s been a long time out of the cabinet and is
sufficiently distant from Tony to be regarded as not requiring the
presentational finesse of a “rolling” Cabinet committee, whatever that
might be. However, our second candidate is most certainly very closely
identified with the prime minister, and retains a high profile [and]
continues to operate at a very high level indeed, whether in Europe,
Japan, or even the Middle East.”
“Peter Mandelson began political life as a member of the Communist
Party, soon “seeing the light” and instead getting involved with the
CIA/MI6-financed Socialist International youth wing and the Labour
Party, through which he rose in parallel with his experience working at
London Weekend Television with other A-list regulars like John Birt and
Michael Maclay, now public mouthpiece of Hakluyt, the private sector
spook outfit run by a bunch of “ex” MI6 types including the widow of
ex-Labour leader John Smith. This sort of background and connections
makes Mandelson very useful in the sort of corridors-and-alleyways
diplomacy and networking that is the real substance of international
relations and intelligence gathering. [....] If Mandelson is indeed the
suspect, then the damage this could cause may fatally wound Blair.”
“An interesting development that may, or may not, be related to this,
is the publication of an article in last Sunday’s Observer by David
Aaronovitch. He and Mandelson are longtime friends, having been together
in the Communist Party and at London Weekend TV. Aaronovitch was, until
recently, a leading political commentator for the Independent, on whose
“international advisory board” (the standard vanity collection of
august persons put together for the ego of newspaper proprietors like
Tony O’Reilly and Conrad Black) sits Peter Mandelson.”
“Since switching to the Guardian Media Group at the beginning of this
year or thereabouts, Aaronovitch authored an article on child abuse in
which he pleads for common sense to prevail, rather than the lynch mob:
‘Strangely I trust the police to act sensibly (because, like the
analysts, they’ve seen it all): it’s the rest of us I worry about.’”
“That much depends upon the behaviour of the US Justice Department,
which ultimately has responsibility for the investigation, must be a
worry for Blair. One need only imagine how this must colour the views of
John Ashcroft regarding the moral fibre of British cabinet ministers
and the laxity of the prime minister who chose them in the first place.
How easy would it be for the suspect to be named in a story that
miraculously surfaced outside of the UK (thereby circumventing the D
Notice and leading potentially to a re-run of the Spycatcher fiasco of
1987)?
“Whoever is on the suspects’ list, we can see that already this
‘rolling’ cabinet committee is busy leaking stories that serve at least
to delay the shock of the inevitable, eventual revelation, buying
valuable time if nothing else. Thus you can depend on the Guardian to
save the day for Tony, and here’s some helpful tip-offs courtesy of MI6
that help to distract from what’s really going on, whilst bolstering the
reputation for integrity and financial propriety that has marked
Blair’s dealings with businesspeople like Bernie Ecclestone, Richard
Desmond, Lakshmi Mittal, etc.”
“I have come to the considered conclusion,” says a correspondent of
Keaney, William Palfreman, “that the events surrounding the Dunblane
massacre, and the subsequent submissions to the Cullen enquiry that have
been put under to 100 years of secrecy, far out weigh in political
significance issues such as our opposition to the EU [and] what it
entails. It is inconceivable that T Blair, Jack Straw [and] Gordon Brown
can survive in office as this matter becomes known. It totally
undermines the Labour government, and could easily be a case of the
Queen feeling she has to use reserve powers to call an emergency general
election, such would be the loss of confidence.”
“This scandal is far more important that anything that has happened
here in living memory, in fact I can think of no parallel for it. It
certainly pisses all over anything that happened to Kennedy or was done
by Nixon. I am surprised, given the gravity of this matter, that [an]
attempt has yet to be made on his life, for surely we are dealing with
desperate people here. It also explains a few strange things, such as
just why T Blair & co. were so keen to ban all handguns, and why
such obviously talentless nobodies like George Robertson have risen from
being backbench nobodies a couple of years ago to Defence Secretary,
and now Secretary-General of Nato.”
“[....] Now where in this is there a national security risk so great,
that documents part of the public enquiry are now state secrets to be
held for 100 years? Funny kind of public enquiry. Why, when Thomas
Hamilton’s application for a gun licence was turned down, due to him
being regarded as a man of unsound character [and] him being the object
of several paedophilia investigations, did his MP, our friend George
Robertson (now Lord Robertson, Secretary-General of NATO), write him a
glowing character reference, and personally see to it that his
application was successful, when he knew the grounds for the original
refusal were because he was suspected of procuring boys for sexual
services?”
“Or take a certain boat seized on Loch Ness [Loch Lomond] by the
Strathclyde Police. It is a very rare thing for assets to be seized in
the UK, as [there] are no asset-forfeiture laws. When it does happen,
there is normally a trial at least, with things only being seized if
they are proven to be bought with money proven to be consequence of a
proven crime. Even then, they are sold by public auction. How come,
then, was this very valuable boat sold for the tiny sum of £5000,
without an auction, to none other than our friend Thomas Hamilton, a man
of no financial means whatsoever, nor a sailor, nor lived anywhere near
any open water. Why did not the boats owners complain about having
their property stolen from them in this manner? I can only conclude
because it was being used for some very serious criminal activity, and
those on board were merely glad to escape prosecution. Also, it seems
rather odd in such circumstances that not only were the owners happy to
avoid prosecution enough to lose a valuable boat, but that the
Strathclyde Police were not willing to prosecute. And yet, after these
improbable events, it wound up in none other than our friend Hamilton’s
hands. Could he have been a blackmailer as well as a paedophile?”
“But the main thing is what might explain sections of the public
enquiry are now under the hundred year rule. There are only three levels
of secrecy in the UK for state secrets, the 30 year rule, the 80 year
rule and the 100 year rule. Normal secrets, like Cabinet discussions,
government papers, espionage, all that, are under the 30 year rule. Only
a very small number of things ever reached the 80 year rule,
particularly events in the Sudan with Kitchener in 1902, where it seems
that an act of genocide was committed, and some things that happened
1914-18, as well as things like potential peace negotiations in 1941,
and just about everything to do with the IRA (after all, people are
still alive after 30 years) come under the 80 year rule. Of them, the
darkest of state secrets, when the events of ’02 were getting a bit
close to their limit for comfort, a further class of secrets was created
to last a hundred years, and tiny number of things were put in it –
e.g. Kitchener in ’02, some World War I things.”
But none of these things can be said to apply to Dunblane. That was a
case of a common criminal [and] sexual pervert committing some fairly
ordinary murders, of a kind that happen from time to time. Even if a
backbench Labour MP was implicated, or may have been involved in a large
paedophile ring in Scotland, that is not a matter of vital national
importance. You have a prosecution, there is a bit of a scandal,
everyone is disgusted and one MP goes to prison. Big deal: such things
happen. You certainly would not make such information a state secret
just to save one unnamed backbench nobody’s miserable neck. Governments
simply don’t go to such extreme lengths to save nobodies – power broking
just doesn’t work like that. There must be issues of profound national
importance working here, and I put it to you that anything that involves
certain events in Scotland is more likely to be someone of cabinet
level than anything else.
If the physiologically flawed [although Thomas Hamilton was these
were the words of Tony Blair when speaking of Gordon Brown] Thomas
Hamilton was the centre of a paedophile ring in Scotland that procured
boys to people of the amongst the highest rank, and Tony Blair [and]
Jack Straw covered this up by the Official Secrets Act (They would do
the covering, as both the Prime Minister’s [and] Home Secretary’s
permission is needed to put some something under the 100 year rule.) it
is hard to see how they or their close colleges could possibly remain in
office, even if they were never inclined to such flawed behaviour
themselves. The government would fall.”
That prospect seems to be energising a government now considered to
be fighting for its political life, even to the extent of killing the
review process by which some of the banned sections of the Cullen Report
would be made public, arguing that freedom of information would somehow
harm other abused children in Dunblane.
In a recent interview with the Guardian newspaper, Michael Matheson,
the Scottish National Party’s shadow deputy justice minister, said:
“There are more documents covered by the 100-year rule than this police
report. Some of them have nothing whatsoever to do with children. We
need to look at why such a lengthy ban has been imposed on them. I have
been contacted by a number of families affected by the tragedy who are
anxious to ensure this information becomes public. And so far we have no
guarantee that it will. We only have a review.”
“It is important we make available, if it is at all possible, any
information that is available about people in the public eye,” said the
Scottish first minister, Jack McConnell.
When Tony Blair took office following a landslide victory in 1997,
few commentators would have suggested that this man would be willing to
drag his country into a war of unjustified aggression against a people
that have done no harm to the British public. Nor would anyone have
surmised that a Labour government would hitch its political fortunes to a
shabby cabal of fanatical neoconservative Zionists working to make real
their much-touted biblical Armageddon. And no one could have predicted
that Blair’s nominally “Christian” administration would transform itself
into a licentious club of flamboyant homosexual cruisers and
out-of-control paedophiles.
But it is now becoming shockingly clear that the slavish adherence of
Tony Blair and Jack Straw to the Bush line on Iraq may have less to do
with principled arguments, and much more to do with the fear of CIA and
FBI revelations that would make them two of the most hated politicians
in modern British political history.
Michael James is a British freelance journalist and translator, resident in Germany for almost 11 years.
(Most of these links have been brought down by MP's )
-----------------------------------
The following title is reffering to the suppression of information to the British Public
BLACKOUT IN BRITAIN
Posted on 29 January 2003.
By Mike James in Frankfurt, Germany – 29 January 2003
Alleged Paedophiles at Helm of Britain’s War Machine
A child-sex scandal that threatened to destroy Tony Blair’s
government last week has been mysteriously squashed and wiped off the
front pages of British newspapers.
Operation Ore, the United Kingdom’s most thorough and comprehensive
police investigation of crimes against children, seems to have uncovered
more than is politically acceptable at the highest reaches of the
British elite.
In the 19th of January edition of The Sunday Herald, Neil Mackay
sensationally reported that senior members of Tony Blair’s government
were being investigated for paedophilia and the “enjoyment” of child-sex
pornography:
“The Sunday Herald has also had confirmed by a very senior source in
British intelligence that at least one high-profile former Labour
Cabinet minister is among Operation Ore suspects. The Sunday Herald has
been given the politician’s name but, for legal reasons, can not
identify the person.
There are still unconfirmed rumours that another senior Labour
politician is among the suspects. The intelligence officer said that a
‘rolling’ Cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with
the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the government
if
arrests occur.”
The allegations are the most serious yet levelled at an
administration that prides itself on the inclusion in its ranks of a
high quota of controversial and flamboyant homosexual men, and whose
First Lady, Cherie Blair, has come under the spotlight for her
indulgence in pagan rituals that resemble Freemasonic rites. Unconfirmed
information also suggests that the term “former Labour Cabinet
minister” is misleading and that the investigation has identified a
surprisingly large number of alleged paedophiles at the highest level of
British government, including one very senior cabinet minister (known
to Propaganda Matrix.com).
The Blair government has responded by imposing a comprehensive
blackout on the story, effectively removing it from the domain of public
discussion. Attempts on the part of this journalist to establish why
the British media has not followed up on the revelations have met with a
wall of silence. Editors and journalists of The Times, The Daily
Telegraph, The Guardian, The Independent, The Sunday Times, The
Observer, The Sunday Telegraph, The Daily Mail, The Daily Express, The
Mirror, The Sun, the BBC, Independent Television News and even The
Sunday Herald have refused to discuss the matter.
Speaking from London, freelance journalist Bob Kearley told me:
“Whether or not a D-Notice has been issued is not clear. But based on
some of the feedback I’ve been getting it’s apparent that editors and
media owners have voluntarily agreed not to cover the story at this
time. Operation Ore is still being reported, but not in regard to
government ministers, and it’s taking up very few column inches on the
third or fourth page. Don’t forget that the intelligence services are
involved here, and Blair is anxious to ensure that the scandal does not
rock the boat at a time when the country is about to go to war.”
“You can imagine the effect this would have on the morale of troops
who are about to commit in Iraq. In fact morale is reportedly quite low
anyway, with service personnel throwing their vaccines into the sea en
route to the battlefront and knowing how unpopular the war is with the
British people. And a lot of squaddies I’ve met think there’s something
weird going on between Bush and Blair. If you’re then told that the
executive responsible for the conduct of the war is staffed by
child-molesters … well, then Saddam suddenly looks like the sort of
bloke with
whom you can share a few tins [beer].”
[In an E mail to Paul Joseph Watson, Mike James identified his
sources as "people I knew in London who used to work for the Treasury
department throughout the 1980s, one being a private secretary at a
senior level....my sources will definitely refuse to support my claims -
both are doing extremely well financially and career-wise."]
